Overview
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to limit the number of repeated authentication attempts from a single user or IP address within a short period. Without such restrictions, attackers can use automated tools to rapidly submit thousands or millions of password guesses (brute-force attack) or common passwords (dictionary attack) against valid usernames. This significantly increases the likelihood of an attacker guessing a correct password and gaining unauthorized access. 🔑➡️💥Business Impact
Failure to restrict excessive authentication attempts directly leads to:- Account Takeover: Attackers can systematically guess weak or common passwords, compromising user accounts.
- Denial of Service (Account Lockout): If the only defense is permanent account lockout after a few tries, attackers can intentionally lock out legitimate users. A better approach often involves temporary lockouts or CAPTCHAs.
- Resource Consumption: Brute-force attacks can consume server CPU and network bandwidth.
- Detection Evasion: Slow, distributed brute-force attacks might go unnoticed if basic attempt logging is the only defense.
Reference Details
CWE ID: CWE-307
Related CWEs: CWE-799 (Improper Control of Interaction Frequency), CWE-1216 (Lockout Errors)
OWASP Top 10 (2021): A07:2021 - Identification and Authentication Failures
Severity: High
Framework-Specific Analysis and Remediation
Brute-force protection is usually implemented via rate limiting (temporary blocking) or account lockout (temporary or requiring admin intervention). This often involves tracking failed login attempts per username and/or IP address in a cache (like Redis) or database. Many frameworks have plugins or built-in features, but custom logic is also common. Key Remediation Principles:- Limit Attempts per IP: Track failed login attempts by IP address and temporarily block IPs with excessive failures (e.g., block for 5 minutes after 20 attempts).
- Limit Attempts per Username: Track failed login attempts per username and implement stronger protections like temporary account lockout (e.g., lock for 30 minutes after 5 failed attempts) or requiring a CAPTCHA.
- Use Exponential Backoff: Increase the lockout duration after repeated lockout events for the same account or IP.
- Secure Lockout Mechanism: Ensure the lockout mechanism itself cannot be abused for Denial of Service (e.g., avoid permanent lockouts triggered solely by failed attempts).
- Logging and Monitoring: Log failed login attempts and lockout events to detect attacks. Alert administrators to high rates of failures.
- Python
- Java
- .NET(C#)
- PHP
- Node.js
- Ruby
Framework Context
Using libraries likedjango-ratelimit, django-axes, Flask-Limiter to apply limits specifically to login views.Vulnerable Scenario 1: No Login Attempt Limit (Django)
Vulnerable Scenario 2: Unprotected API Endpoint (Flask)
Mitigation and Best Practices
Integrate a rate-limiting library. Apply decorators or middleware to the specific views/routes that need protection. Use Redis or Memcached for distributed rate limiting in multi-server environments.Secure Code Example
Testing Strategy
Use automated tools (likewfuzz, ffuf, Burp Intruder) or simple scripts (e.g., curl in a loop) to send rapid, repeated requests to login endpoints, password reset forms, and resource-intensive API endpoints. Verify that after exceeding the configured limit, the server responds with an appropriate error (e.g., 429 Too Many Requests) and blocks further requests for a period. Test different keys (IP vs. user vs. form field).
