Overview
Improper Authentication occurs when an application incorrectly verifies, or fails to verify, a user’s identity. This is a broad category covering various flaws in the login mechanism itself, distinct from missing authentication entirely (CWE-306) or authorization issues. Examples include:
- Accepting incorrect passwords or credentials under certain conditions.
- Vulnerabilities related to type juggling or comparison errors (e.g.,
'0' == 0being true in PHP). - Allowing authentication bypass through alternate channels or error conditions.
- Incorrectly implementing cryptographic signature checks for token-based authentication (related to
CWE-347). - Flaws in multi-factor authentication logic. 🔑❓
Business Impact
Flaws in the authentication mechanism itself can allow attackers to bypass login procedures entirely:- Account Takeover: Attackers gain access to arbitrary user accounts without needing the correct credentials.
- Privilege Escalation: Attackers might bypass authentication for administrative accounts.
- Complete System Compromise: If authentication is bypassed for critical system functions.
Reference Details
CWE ID: CWE-287
Related CWEs: CWE-288 (Auth Bypass Alt Path), CWE-290 (Spoofing), CWE-304 (Missing Critical Step)
OWASP Top 10 (2021): A07:2021 - Identification and Authentication Failures
Severity: Critical
Framework-Specific Analysis and Remediation
While modern frameworks provide robust authentication libraries (Django Auth, Spring Security, ASP.NET Core Identity, Passport.js, Devise), vulnerabilities often arise from:- Custom Implementations: Developers building their own authentication logic introduce subtle flaws.
- Misconfiguration: Incorrectly configuring framework authentication (e.g., allowing null passwords, misconfiguring providers).
- Integration Errors: Flaws in how different authentication systems (e.g., LDAP, OAuth, SAML) are integrated.
- Use Framework Defaults: Rely on the built-in, vetted authentication mechanisms of your framework whenever possible.
- Strong Credential Comparison: Use constant-time comparison functions for passwords and tokens to prevent timing attacks. Frameworks usually handle this internally.
- Type Safety: Use strict comparisons (e.g.,
===in PHP/JS,.equals()in Java, strong typing) when checking credentials or states. - Fail Securely: Ensure error conditions during login do not accidentally grant access.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Implement MFA for enhanced security.
- Python
- Java
- .NET(C#)
- PHP
- Node.js
- Ruby
Framework Context
Custom authentication backends in Django or manual password checking in Flask that contain logical errors.Vulnerable Scenario 1: Custom Django Backend Error
A custom backend tries to handle multiple user types but allows bypass if an error occurs.Vulnerable Scenario 2: Flask Manual Check with Null Password Issue
Mitigation and Best Practices
- Django: Use the default
ModelBackendor inherit from it carefully. Ensure customauthenticatemethods handle all exceptions securely (fail closed by returningNone). Rely onuser.check_password(). - Flask: Always use secure comparison functions like
werkzeug.security.check_password_hash. Ensure users cannot register or exist with null/empty passwords. Handle exceptions properly.
Secure Code Example
Testing Strategy
Test login functionality thoroughly:- Invalid Credentials: Ensure incorrect usernames/passwords fail.
- Empty/Null Credentials: Try logging in with empty username or password. Does it bypass login? (Should fail).
- Error Conditions: Try to cause database errors during login (e.g., overly long username). Does the application fail securely (deny access)?
- Case Sensitivity: Check if username comparisons are case-sensitive or insensitive as intended.
- Timing Attacks: If using custom comparison logic (not recommended), check if comparing incorrect passwords takes significantly less time than correct ones. Standard library functions usually prevent this.

